<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>St. Mark&#039;s Lutheran &#187; Two Kingdoms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saintmarkslutheran.org/tag/two-kingdoms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saintmarkslutheran.org</link>
	<description>West Henrietta, NY</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 13:14:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Joseph Bottom has been Listening to the Lectionary&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.saintmarkslutheran.org/2010/08/24/joseph-bottom-has-been-listening-to-the-lectionary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.saintmarkslutheran.org/2010/08/24/joseph-bottom-has-been-listening-to-the-lectionary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Parson Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Two Kingdoms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saintmarkslutheran.org/?p=1144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='fb-like'></p><p>Here is an essay by the above mentioned Joseph Bottom at First Things.  Warning, it is deep and political and not a simple read.  Truly about First Things as an American.</p>
<p>We come across these hard sayings like, &#8220;I&#8217;ve not come to bring peace but division (Luke 12:51)&#8221; or the refrain &#8220;the first will <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.saintmarkslutheran.org/2010/08/24/joseph-bottom-has-been-listening-to-the-lectionary/">Joseph Bottom has been Listening to the Lectionary&#8230;</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class='fb-like'><iframe src='http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http://www.saintmarkslutheran.org/2010/08/24/joseph-bottom-has-been-listening-to-the-lectionary/&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=260&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light' scrolling='no' frameborder='0' allowTransparency='true' style='border:none; overflow:hidden; width:260px; height:26px'></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.firstthings.com/onthesquare/2010/08/the-bible-in-the-public-square">Here is an essay</a> by the above mentioned Joseph Bottom at First Things.  Warning, it is deep and political and not a simple read.  Truly about First Things as an American.</p>
<p>We come across these hard sayings like, &#8220;I&#8217;ve not come to bring peace but division (<a href="http://biblegateway.com/bible?version=51&amp;passage=Luke+12%3A51" class="bibleref" title="NLT Luke 12:51">Luke 12:51</a>)&#8221; or the refrain &#8220;the first will be last and the last first (<a href="http://biblegateway.com/bible?version=51&amp;passage=Luke+13%3A30" class="bibleref" title="NLT Luke 13:30">Luke 13:30</a>)&#8221;, and they shake us a bit.  All political orders are built on the law.  And the law is good.  We understand the law.  The law gives us sure ground to stand upon.  But when the perfect comes, the partial will pass away (<a href="http://biblegateway.com/bible?version=51&amp;passage=1+Cor+13%3A10" class="bibleref" title="NLT 1Cor 13:10">1 Cor 13:10</a>).  And the perfect has come in Jesus Christ.  The perfect is the gospel of grace.  Just like those sayings, the gospel is counter-intuitive.  That&#8217;s why it needs repeating.  It is also why any institution or political order, as good as the law is, must make room for something other than itself.  It is very hard for any institution or order to admit to another sovereign.  Primarily because we make them up, and we aren&#8217;t too good at it ourselves.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.saintmarkslutheran.org/2010/08/24/joseph-bottom-has-been-listening-to-the-lectionary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Warning &#8211; This Man Has No Ecclesiology</title>
		<link>http://www.saintmarkslutheran.org/2010/08/13/warning-this-man-has-no-ecclesiology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.saintmarkslutheran.org/2010/08/13/warning-this-man-has-no-ecclesiology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 03:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Parson Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law and gospel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lefthand kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[righthand kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Two Kingdoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[una sancta]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saintmarkslutheran.org/?p=1103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='fb-like'></p><p>Here is a fun site to check in on every once in a while.  Three women with a bunch of kids.  Our three are put to shame.  The particular post is trying to think about where church ends and politics begins.  That is where the title of this post comes from. <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.saintmarkslutheran.org/2010/08/13/warning-this-man-has-no-ecclesiology/">Warning &#8211; This Man Has No Ecclesiology</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class='fb-like'><iframe src='http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http://www.saintmarkslutheran.org/2010/08/13/warning-this-man-has-no-ecclesiology/&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=260&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light' scrolling='no' frameborder='0' allowTransparency='true' style='border:none; overflow:hidden; width:260px; height:26px'></iframe></p><p><a href="http://concordiansisters.blogspot.com/2010/08/theses-on-bashing-synodical-bureaucrats.html">Here</a> is a fun site to check in on every once in a while.  Three women with a bunch of kids.  Our three are put to shame.  The particular post is trying to think about where church ends and politics begins.  That is where the title of this post comes from.  It is a reference to a Lutheran inside joke and a theologian by the name of Forde.  (Ask me and I&#8217;ll explain further).</p>
<p>As Lutheran&#8217;s we belive in the &#8220;one, holy, catholic and apostolic church&#8221;.  Big problem there is it is an article of faith.  We can&#8217;t see it.  Even if we could see it here and now (i.e. Rome&#8217;s claims were right), we still couldn&#8217;t see it as the una sancta is in all times and all places, many of which have gone to their reward.</p>
<p>Confessionally we also profess the local congregation.  <a href="http://bookofconcord.org/augsburgconfession.php#article7">AC7</a> &#8211; where the gospel is preached the sacraments administered.</p>
<p>Is there anything that is &#8220;church&#8221; between those two things &#8211; the one holy and the local congregation.  There are many in the LCMS who have spent a great deal of time and energy trying to say yes.</p>
<p>Of course saying no doesn&#8217;t relieve someone of being civil to bureaucrats, but it does remove that slightly ill feeling of doing secular things in holy spaces.  I think Rebekah&#8217;s theses are on the right track.  These political assemblies called churches are really political entities (in the left hand kingdom in fancy Lutheran speak).  Those in them deserve civil respect.  The respect you would give a judge or the police.  Which is much more than they often get.  But these &#8220;churches&#8221; are not repositories of the gospel.  They do not speak for the one holy.  They can, but that take decades or centuries to sort out and then other voices join them.</p>
<p>A bunch of things become clearer when we see these intermediate bodies as law oriented bodies for the sake of the gospel.  You want the gospel?  Go to your congregation and expect the one holy we see in Revelation.  You want to effectively manage the civil affairs? Send your best people and trust that they are doing the best they can.  But don&#8217;t confuse their work for the church or the gospel.  Doing so is claiming the same thing as Rome, and bluntly if anyone is going to claim that, the guy in Rome has a better case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.saintmarkslutheran.org/2010/08/13/warning-this-man-has-no-ecclesiology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Burden of Leaders &#8211; Laws of the Left Hand Kingdom/The Kingdom of the Law</title>
		<link>http://www.saintmarkslutheran.org/2009/06/26/burden-of-leaders-laws-of-the-left-hand-kingdomthe-kingdom-of-the-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.saintmarkslutheran.org/2009/06/26/burden-of-leaders-laws-of-the-left-hand-kingdomthe-kingdom-of-the-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Parson Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meditation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deuteronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Two Kingdoms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saintmarkslutheran.org/?p=829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='fb-like'></p><p>Text: Deuteronomy 16:18-20, Deuteronomy 17:14-20</p>
<p>One of the great confusions of the day is that between the Kingdom of Grace and the Kingdom of the Law.  God is in control of both of them.  That is the biblical witness, but He chooses to operate differently in each.  In the Kingdom of Grace God <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.saintmarkslutheran.org/2009/06/26/burden-of-leaders-laws-of-the-left-hand-kingdomthe-kingdom-of-the-law/">Burden of Leaders &#8211; Laws of the Left Hand Kingdom/The Kingdom of the Law</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class='fb-like'><iframe src='http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http://www.saintmarkslutheran.org/2009/06/26/burden-of-leaders-laws-of-the-left-hand-kingdomthe-kingdom-of-the-law/&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=260&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light' scrolling='no' frameborder='0' allowTransparency='true' style='border:none; overflow:hidden; width:260px; height:26px'></iframe></p><p>Text: <a href="http://biblegateway.com/bible?version=51&amp;passage=Deuteronomy+16%3A18-20" class="bibleref" title="NLT Deuteronomy 16:18-20">Deuteronomy 16:18-20</a>, <a href="http://biblegateway.com/bible?version=51&amp;passage=Deuteronomy+17%3A14-20" class="bibleref" title="NLT Deuteronomy 17:14-20">Deuteronomy 17:14-20</a></p>
<p>One of the great confusions of the day is that between the Kingdom of Grace and the Kingdom of the Law.  God is in control of both of them.  That is the biblical witness, but He chooses to operate differently in each.  In the Kingdom of Grace God operates and rules directly. Jesus is present in the Word and in the Sacraments of the church which He rules through that same Word and those sacraments offering His grace to all believers.  </p>
<p>In the Kindgom of the Law God operates at a remove.  He allows freedom within rules.  Some of those rules are the physical rules of the universe.  We can discover what those are and they put boundaries and safety on our existence.  In a more biblical way think of what God asked Job &#8211; were you there when I streched a plumb line over the universe or who keeps the sea in its boundaries?  It is pretty hard to transgress the law of gravity, but other &#8220;laws&#8221; are still binding but can be transgressed.  Some of those laws are the expectations placed on those who have power in the Kingdom of the Law.  Rulers have been given the authority for a purpose &#8211; to rule justly and ensure order.  When Israel takes the land the judges and officers are to rule justly, not pervert justice, don&#8217;t show partiality, don&#8217;t take bribes.  Those that are set like a king receive that power and authority not to &#8216;multiply silver and gold for himslef.&#8217;  They should instead have the book of the law at their side in their own hand.  [Imagine copying the entire Torah yourself.  It would ensure at least one reading.]  The judgement on those given authority is surely harsher.</p>
<p>We get these kingdoms mixed up all the time.  We are always &#8216;looking for God&#8217;s will&#8217; in the Kingdom of the Law while trying to take God&#8217;s authority in the Kingdom of Grace.  Believers usually make the mistakes in looking for God&#8217;s direct involvement in the Kingdom of the Law when that is exactly where God has given us freedom.  We want surety about choice of wife/husband or even something as mundane as monetary investments.  God does not give surety in those places, but does counsel wisdom.  Read Proverbs or Ecclesiastes.  Wisdom is rarely followed, but it is something we can learn and follow.</p>
<p>And then there are the multitude of ways we confuse the Kingdom of Grace.  We try to usurp God rule by turning grace into a law &#8211; works righteousness.  Or trying to apply the Law to grace like <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124597314928257169.html#mod=djemITP">this article </a>by a Scientist.  Here is the money quote&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>So while scientific rationality does not require atheism, it is by no means irrational to use it as the basis for arguing against the existence of God, and thus to conclude that claimed miracles like the virgin birth are incompatible with our scientific understanding of nature.</p>
<p>Finally, it is worth pointing out that these issues are not purely academic. The current crisis in Iran has laid bare the striking inconsistency between a world built on reason and a world built on religious dogma.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most important contribution an honest assessment of the incompatibility between science and religious doctrine can provide is to make it starkly clear that in human affairs &#8212; as well as in the rest of the physical world &#8212; reason is the better guide.</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course the Virgin birth is nonsensical to the Kingdom of the Law becuase it was God&#8217;s direct action as part of the plan of salvation.  It was an act of the Kingdom of Grace.  God rules both.  Occasionally to further Grace the law is superceeded.  </p>
<p>The only way we know this is by the grace of revelation.  I completely argee with this scientist that in human affairs reason is the better guide.  The path of wisdom is the best one in that Kingdom.  In fact in human affairs that is the only path.  For Christians to be looking for Special revelation beyond the dictates of Wisdom is a confusion of the Kingdoms.  But just becuase Christians (or Iranian Imams) have tried to enlarge the kingdom of Grace beyond its borders doesn&#8217;t mean that the revealed truths of it don&#8217;t exist &#8211; like the virgin birth.</p>
<p>Confusion of the Kingdoms is one of our fundamental flaws, but those Kingdoms are part glory of how the universe operates both giving us freedom and salvation.  They each have things to say to each other, but usually we are too busy trying to usurp each Kingdom&#8217;s unique rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.saintmarkslutheran.org/2009/06/26/burden-of-leaders-laws-of-the-left-hand-kingdomthe-kingdom-of-the-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sermon &#8211; Memorial Day &#8211; Two Kingdoms</title>
		<link>http://www.saintmarkslutheran.org/2009/05/24/sermon-memorial-day-two-kingdoms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.saintmarkslutheran.org/2009/05/24/sermon-memorial-day-two-kingdoms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 21:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Parson Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[John]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sermons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Word]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holiday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memorial Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Two Kingdoms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saintmarkslutheran.org/?p=786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='fb-like'></p><p>
Full Text</p>
<p>This is a sermon that I am probably too proud of.  I have the feeling that is was a pastor&#8217;s sermon &#8211; that I was communicating with myself, but not too many others.  But even with that, I still like it and here is why &#8211; it offers something for the head, <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.saintmarkslutheran.org/2009/05/24/sermon-memorial-day-two-kingdoms/">Sermon &#8211; Memorial Day &#8211; Two Kingdoms</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class='fb-like'><iframe src='http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http://www.saintmarkslutheran.org/2009/05/24/sermon-memorial-day-two-kingdoms/&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=260&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light' scrolling='no' frameborder='0' allowTransparency='true' style='border:none; overflow:hidden; width:260px; height:26px'></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.saintmarkslutheran.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/wordle2.jpg"><img src="http://www.saintmarkslutheran.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/wordle2.jpg" alt="wordle2" title="wordle2" width="400" height="500" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-788" /></a><br />
<a href='http://www.saintmarkslutheran.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/draft-101.doc'>Full Text</a></p>
<p>This is a sermon that I am probably too proud of.  I have the feeling that is was a pastor&#8217;s sermon &#8211; that I was communicating with myself, but not too many others.  But even with that, I still like it and here is why &#8211; it offers something for the head, the heart and the hands.  It presented a common emotional question and answered it in both intellectual terms and emotional terms.  It also managed to address a secular event and bring in a Christian framework.  I think and feel that it was solid and balanced.</p>
<p>The theology was the two kingdoms.  Jesus prays in the text for the Sermon (<a href="http://biblegateway.com/bible?version=51&amp;passage=John+17%3A11-19" class="bibleref" title="NLT John 17:11-19">John 17:11-19</a>) for his disciples &#8220;not to be taken from the world, but to be protected from the evil one.&#8221;  The are not of the world, but they are sent to the world.  Combined with the secular calendar Memorial Day and the Christian calendar Ascension Day, the question is why?  Why if Jesus Christ is enthroned at the right hand of the Father do we still have days like Memorial Day?  The temptation is always to theodicy, or explaining the ways of God to men.  God is a big boy, he can explain himself.  But he does explain how he works in this world most of the time &#8211; through us.  In the Kingdom of Power or of the left, God works through means.  What that mean is that the crooked timber of humanity provides the material of the Kingdom of Power.  And that often results in evil as we go our own way.  What we are assured of though is that the Kingdom of Grace, which is the Kingdom that Christians are citizens of, is only under God&#8217;s control and action.  In Jesus Christ, God has done everything necessary for our salvation.  So, we as Christians are in the Kingdom of Power, but we are not of it.  We have a mission in it to proclaim the Kingdom of Grace &#8211; your sins have been forgiven in Jesus Christ.</p>
<p>The emotion is the just as we cause wars in the that kingdom of power, such as the carnage of the civil war, and carry their effects, so also did Jesus Christ.  Jesus submitted to our justice, to the authority of the Kingdom of Power.  God does not answer the why question, but he does ask us to have faith in him that He is in control and looking out for his Children.  His deeds speak to why we should have that faith.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.saintmarkslutheran.org/2009/05/24/sermon-memorial-day-two-kingdoms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
