“What keeps gnawing at me is the question, what is Christianity, or who is Christ actually for us today? The age when we could tell people that with words—whether with theological or with pious words—is past, as is the age of inwardness and of conscience, and that means the age of religion altogether. We are approaching a completely religionless age; people as they are now simply cannot be religious anymore. Even those who honestly describe themselves as ‘religious’ aren’t really practicing that at all; they presumably mean something quite different by ‘religious.’”—Dietrich Bonhoeffer
1. When Bonhoeffer thought about “religionless Christianity” what he meant was a church that did not have the authority to bind.
2. Even into the 20th century, for large numbers of western people the church maintained the ability to discipline which is the ability to bind
3. That ability existed regardless of the state of one’s faith. The unbelieving libertine would face the binding authority of social stigma.
4. The upheavals of the 20th century have left the church not only unable to bind non-believers, but believers as well are unbound.
5. Believers are unbound in that the church is a personal choice. One might bind themselves but nobody is bound to pope or creed without consent.
6. The state and the family remain the only binding authorities, and the family is disintegrating fast.
7. In this religionless Christianity, the church is suffering a state of humiliation as Her Lord suffered.
8. The state of humiliation did not change the fact that Jesus was the eternal son.
9. Likewise the church’s humiliation does not change the eternal facts of the office of the keys. What is bound remains bound.
10. What it will make clear is that the motivations of binding words are love, not power.