2 Timothy 3:1-17
Word of God as a rain shower, God’s Word is Our Great Heritage (LSB 582), repentance and nourishment under the word
Monthly Archives: January 2014
Ross Douthat is fired up (for Mr. Douthat word count = emotional argument I think). I’m going to try an restate the core argument and then add a personal reflection.
Mr. Douthat’s core argument. Explicit rules on sex, marriage, family and the good life were erased in the sexual revolution. Anyone who had the cognitive ability and social capital or some mixture of those implicitly maintained the former explicit rules. They did this on the basis of what I’d call life scripts. As children were growing parents would limit exposure to failure and increase exposure to potential life paths and opportunities. The phrase helicopter parent is really just a reflection of successful parents attempting to pass along their secrets. The core gnostic secret to a materially successful and happy life is to marry well. The secret to marrying well is to treat sex not as casual and definitely not something you just do because of passing emotion. The culture, through the language of church law, used to pass this now secret knowledge on to everybody. (Don’t commit adultery. What does this mean? Luther’s answer. Marriage is one man and one woman for a multitude of purposes (companionship & support, mutual delight, procreation, passing along the faith) as per Cranmer’s marriage liturgy and the current LSB stealing of it.) The making of formerly explicit codes into implicit life scripts, public proclamation into secret knowledge, is a form of class warfare. Social liberals who have both brains and social capital are able to be somewhat libertine in their college years without ruining their lives. As long as those years don’t interfere with acquiring the right credentials, everything is forgiven. The rest of society gets Miley Cyrus, STDs, divorce, never married mothers, Honey Boo-Boo families and abortions.
There are religious enclaves (Mormons, Confessional churches) that continue to explicitly pass along and attempt to enforce the rules. Pre-sexual revolution the actual law did this as divorce was much tougher and abortion illegal. Did this fall on women hard? Yes, especially on those who couldn’t follow. The flip side is that many men became “good men” because the social laws taught them correctly. The first use of the law is the civil or curb, to protect sinful man from himself. I say enclaves, because to do this today requires a community that is stronger than the formal law. Mormon’s in Utah don’t need state law.
Upper West Side liberals and religious conservatives actually would agree at a material level on the good life. Religious conservatives actually have a language and program that worked for centuries. UWSL’s have a program that works for them, to hell with the rest, I’ve got mine. What language could be used that would extend that civil use of the law to shelter more people? How do you get UWSLs who despise the church to accept the core teaching? More later.
2 Timothy 1:1-18
The Promised Land to the New Jerusalem, living in the now seeing the the not-yet through Spirit eyes
I’m losing my Powerpoint skills. I just finished a presentation for LINC that didn’t include even a nice style sheet overlay or a 4-up chart distilling things. At the end of that I ran accross this. Seeing as we are studying 1 Corinthians in bible class right now, I had a laugh. If you have ever been a speaker of powerpoint, you should watch this and feel your soul stirred.
A Devotional Way to Approach Strange Passages – Literal, Typological (Fulfilled in Christ), Moral (Fulfilled in Us), Eschatological (Fulfilled in the Coming Kingdom)
Tough Passages, Reading the Bible with Christ at the center
Biblical Text: Matthew 4:12-25
Full Sermon Draft
The biblical text is Jesus calling two sets of brothers. It is sandwiched between a notice about John the Baptist and a notice about what the Galilean ministry looked like. So the theme is vocation or call. What does it mean to be called? What does this particular call – to follow Jesus – mean? This sermon looks at four pictures and hones in on one theme of all four. The call of discipleship must take primacy or it means nothing.
Radical Grace, Love directed outward
If you have a high nerd/intellectual quotient this is a thought provoking article. Or if you have three kids, pre-read most of their books, and wonder just what we are teaching them. The first paragraph…
The myths, folk tales, and fiction of every culture are part of a feedback loop that both reflects and also shapes cultural values. Such tales provide their listeners with heroes to be imitated and enemies to be despised, with dreams to be chased and errors to be avoided, and, above all, with a sense of what is normal in the world. Through stories comes a sense of shared culture and a shared way of interpreting life. Youths of ancient Greece and Rome were immersed in the hierarchic, heroic culture of The Iliad. Uncle Tom’s Cabin magnified nineteenth-century disapproval of slavery. The Andy Griffith Show upheld trust in the wisdom and authority of sensible, masculine American virtue. These stories all helped to shape the social outlook of young people and to prepare them for entrance into the adult world. In the last forty years, the stories that our culture provides for our youth have acquired a strangely regressive message. It is a change that both reveals and contributes to the tribalism and generational isolation of our era.
The author, Mrs. Mussmann, eventually gets around to The Hunger Games and some others that are on my daughter’s reading list. Personally, I loved the Hunger Games, but then I would. It has taken me 42 years to get as cynical about power and our own ability to fight the “principalities and powers of this dark age” as I am. The Hunger Games portrays power and its struggles exactly as I would expect it. President Snow has it, knows it and can use it to his liking. The technocrats of district 13 are the “1984/Brave New World” version of the same power. Give me Snow any day simply for style and core honesty towards those “in the know”. The (un?)righteous power of the technocrats, and their ability to deny what Snow is honest about, is more dangerous. Snow kills 23 kids a year. You know that the technocrats wouldn’t blink at killing 100,000 if it “made society better” and was attached to a spreadsheet proving the claim. But the core of the story is Katniss. Katniss who starts out fighting for home and hearth. She gets caught up and used by the powers. She almost buys into the alternative power’s story, but in the end finds it just as false. The only truth to be found is home and hearth. All she wants is a quiet life. Which is the one thing neither will give her, because you will be made to care. The soul that sees truly is most to be troubled. But, do I want my 10 year-old to drink deeply of my cynicism? Or don’t call it cynicism, but instead do I want a 10 year old with sense instead of sensibility?
I think Mrs. Mussmann has an argument, but it isn’t quite as strong as it might be. She wants to attack the single age clique, the cult of “my generation”. That is a worthy battle, but the Hunger Games is not a recruit there because Katniss isn’t fighting for her friends. She might be fighting for her tribe, but her tribe is simply those who want to be left alone. That is a great many people of all ages. And, Mrs. Mussmann can only forward the argument by ignoring one set of youth books, Harry Potter. Harry has many of the elements of the story of Katniss. The ministry (of Magic) representing the mass of “old people” is corrupt or useless when it is not actively wrecking things. But the point Mrs. Mussmann finds lacking, “one is never dependent only on one’s peers, because powerful and benevolent forces exist and will come to one’s aid”, is found in the Potter Series. In fact, as the books progress, you become aware that the single generation school environment is a small protective part of the real story. Love protects and saves spiritually, even unrequited love (Snape), especially unrequited love. It is possible to use power responsibly if not without blemish, thinking of Dumbledore, who hides things from Harry and often uses him just as District 13 would use Katniss. Even the Dursleys, comic relief or small people who don’t get it, are acting with the wisdom given them. Magic killed her sister, maybe her husband Vernon has a point in trying to keep it away from Harry. Denial is not good wisdom, and Harry can’t see it at the time, but the Dursleys do come to his aid.
Given the endemic nature of divorce which is itself becoming a quaint notion as the child of divorce is one step ahead of the child of the never married, such cynicism of adults is justified. One can see the power of such flights of fancy as Percy Jackson discovering his “dad” is Poseidon. At least a “god” has some excuse compared to the reality that so many are faced with that “dad just didn’t care enough (or at all)”. (And “he” at least left Percy something powerful.) The truth hidden in these stories is a good one. To me they are ultimately two-kingdom tales. This dark and fallen world is as a whole un-reformable. Use of power ranges from Dumbledore to district 13 – gray to black. Dumbledore who means well, but who uses Harry as a means to an end, and who ultimately is about fulfilling your vocation instead of your desires, to District 13 where you are but a number. After following the pied-piper of Obama (thinking he was Dumbledore instead of the head of District 13) they will more quickly glimpse the truth, the other half of the two-kingdoms truth. This world might be un-reformable, but we also are called to live in another kingdom, a Kingdom coming in its fulness. And we live in that Kingdom when we take responsibility for how we then live, when we live according the things that need no law: love, joy, peace, patience, self-control (Galatians 5:22). That second kingdom has freed us for those things, not for hopeless societal progress defined by the gray and the black.